Quadro 6000 vs Quadro M620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 6000 vs Quadro M620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 6000 vs Quadro M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅81.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌580% higher power demand at 204W vs 30W.

Quadro M620

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 204W, a 174W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 81.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M620 instead at 2,758 vs 2,692, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro 6000 vs Quadro M620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro M620
G3D Mark Score	2,692	2,758+2%
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	512+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS+3%	1 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	896 KB+250%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro M620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 6000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M620 carries 2 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 6000 and 64-bit on the Quadro M620. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 6000) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro M620
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 148.7% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro M620
TDP	204W	30W-85%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	13.2	91.9+596%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 6000 came in at $4399, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M620 was 100+% cheaper ($4399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro 6000) vs Infinity (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M620 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro M620
MSRP	$4399	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	Infinity
Codename	GF100	GM107
Release	December 10 2010	January 11 2017
Ranking	#615	#606

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Search Quadro M620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.