Quadro 6000 vs Quadro K4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 6000 vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 6000 vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅90.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
246.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$1,269 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
❌155% higher power demand at 204W vs 80W.

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,130 less on MSRP ($1,269 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 250.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 204W, a 124W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 90.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K4000 instead at 2,719 vs 2,692, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,130 cheaper on MSRP at $1,269 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 250.1% (2.1 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 6000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 6000 vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro K4000
G3D Mark Score	2,692	2,719+1%
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	1.244 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs	48+100%	24
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+1300%	64 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro K4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 6000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 6000 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Quadro 6000) vs 384 KB (Quadro K4000) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro K4000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+100%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 87.3% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro K4000
TDP	204W	80W-61%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	13.2	34.0+158%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 6000 came in at $4399, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. On MSRP, Quadro K4000 was 71.2% cheaper ($3130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro 6000) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the Quadro K4000 offers 250% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4000 (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Quadro K4000
MSRP	$4399	$1269-71%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	2.1+250%
Codename	GF100	GK106
Release	December 10 2010	March 1 2013
Ranking	#615	#613

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Search Quadro K4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.