MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro 6000

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 6000

2010Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro 6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 204W, a 104W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 104% higher power demand at 204W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MQuadro 6000
G3D Mark Score
2,637
2,692+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
448+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9523 TFLOPS
1.028 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
64+14%
56
L1 Cache
512 KB
896 KB+75%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MQuadro 6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and 64-bit on the Quadro 6000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 768 KB (Quadro 6000) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MQuadro 6000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
6 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 68.4% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MQuadro 6000
TDP
100W-51%
204W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.4+100%
13.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MQuadro 6000
MSRP
$4399
Codename
GF114
GF100
Release
March 22 2012
December 10 2010
Ranking
#704
#615

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.