
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:

Quadro 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 16 and the Quadro 6000 is on rank 374, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.
| Insight | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 6000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Quadro 6000

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Quadro 6000
The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,637 | 2,692+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 448+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 has 6 GB. The Quadro 6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 768 KB (Quadro 6000) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 68.4% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-51% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4+100% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | GF114 | GF100 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | December 10 2010 |
| Ranking | #704 | #615 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















