Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 100W, a 72W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (2,715 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score
2,715+3%
2,637
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
10 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
80
384+380%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M carries 2 GB. MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX
12 (12_1)+9%
11.0
OpenGL
4.6+10%
4.2
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
PureVideo HD
Decoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 112.5% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP
28W-72%
100W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
97.0+267%
26.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2012).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
GF114
Release
August 15 2020
March 22 2012
Ranking
#584
#704

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.