Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

28

2,715

+3.0%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Iris Pro Graphics P580

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

100

2,637

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Benchmark Check

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	2,715+3%	2,637
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	10 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	80	384+380%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	12 (12_1)+9%	11.0
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)	PureVideo HD
Decoder	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)	VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 112.5% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.