Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon R9 M380

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Shared System RAM 28
2,715
0.0%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
Radeon R9 M380
4 GB 75
2,752
+1.4%
brand logoRadeon Vega 10
brand logoRadeon R9 M360
brand logoRadeon 820M
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 8050S
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M380 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M380 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (2,752 vs 2,715), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 M380 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score
2,715
2,752+1%
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
GCN 2.0
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
80
768+860%
Boost Clock
1350 MHz+35%
1000 MHz
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M380 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
96 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon R9 M380
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon R9 M380
Encoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 91.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon R9 M380
TDP
28W-63%
75W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
85
Perf/Watt
97.0+164%
36.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon R9 M380
MSRP
$0-100%
$300
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
9.2
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
Strato
Release
August 15 2020
May 5 2015
Ranking
#584
#607
Search Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 M380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.