
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Quadro K4000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 768 (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,715 | 2,719 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 80 | 768+860% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 96.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-65% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0+185% | 34.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs came in at $0, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($1269 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1269 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.1 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GK106 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #584 | #613 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















