Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

2013Core: 810 MHz
Similar parts
·

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K4000 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K4000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 2,715), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 768 (Quadro K4000).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro K4000
G3D Mark Score
2,715
2,719
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Kepler
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
80
768+860%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro K4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro K4000
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
3 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 96.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro K4000
TDP
28W-65%
80W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
97.0+185%
34.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs came in at $0, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($1269 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro K4000
MSRP
$0-100%
$1269
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.1
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
GK106
Release
August 15 2020
March 1 2013
Ranking
#584
#613

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.