Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon RX 550

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 50W, a 22W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 78.6% higher power demand at 50W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (2,715 vs 2,674), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score
2,715+2%
2,674
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
GCN 4.0
Process Node
10 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
80
512+540%
Boost Clock
1350 MHz+14%
1183 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
112 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon RX 550
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_0
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon RX 550
Encoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 56.4% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 155mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon RX 550
TDP
28W-44%
50W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
300W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
0mm
155mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
97.0+81%
53.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs came in at $0, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsRadeon RX 550
MSRP
$0-100%
$79
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
33.8
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
Lexa
Release
August 15 2020
April 20 2017
Ranking
#584
#617

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.