Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro M620

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M620

2017Core: 756 MHzBoost: 977 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro M620 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro M620

2017

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro M620 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M620 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (2,758 vs 2,715), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro M620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 977 MHz.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro M620
G3D Mark Score
2,715
2,758+2%
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Maxwell
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
80
512+540%
Boost Clock
1350 MHz+38%
977 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro M620
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M620 carries 2 GB. Quadro M620 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and 64-bit on the Quadro M620.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro M620
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 12_1 (Quadro M620). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro M620
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro M620
Encoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 6.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro M620
TDP
28W-7%
30W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
97.0+6%
91.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs came in at $0, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs Infinity (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsQuadro M620
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
GM107
Release
August 15 2020
January 11 2017
Ranking
#584
#606

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.