FirePro W4300
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
FirePro W4300 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4300 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W4300 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro W4300 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌78.6% higher power demand at 50W vs 28W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 50W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 2,715 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+860% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs carries 0 MB. FirePro W4300 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 56.4% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 171mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 28W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 171mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C-16% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4 | 97.0+78% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($379 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Bonaire | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | December 1 2015 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #590 | #584 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
