FirePro W4300 vs GRID M10-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs GRID M10-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W4300 vs GRID M10-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,121 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 566.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌17000% longer card at 171mm vs 1mm.

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 171mm, a 170mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
559.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W4300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 2,692), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W4300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W4300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,121 cheaper on MSRP at $379 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 566.2% (7.2 vs 1.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W4300 vs GRID M10-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the GRID M10-2Q reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID M10-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q).

Feature	FirePro W4300	GRID M10-2Q
G3D Mark Score	2,719+1%	2,692
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.428 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+238%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	192 KB	768 KB+300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W4300	GRID M10-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2Q carries 2 GB. FirePro W4300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W4300	GRID M10-2Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro W4300	GRID M10-2Q
DirectX	12	12_1
Max Displays	6	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GRID M10-2Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (GRID M10-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro W4300	GRID M10-2Q
TDP	50W-78%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	171mm	1mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	71°C	—
Perf/Watt	54.4+353%	12.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 84.8% cheaper ($2121 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) — the FirePro W4300 offers 554.5% better value.

Feature	FirePro W4300	GRID M10-2Q
MSRP	$379-85%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	7.2+555%	1.1
Codename	Bonaire	GM204
Release	December 1 2015	August 30 2015
Ranking	#590	#433

Search FirePro W4300 on Amazon

Search GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.