FirePro W4300
VS
Radeon RX 550

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon RX 550

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W4300 is positioned at rank #168 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300

#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
99%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
98%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
97%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
94%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
93%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
90%
#153
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2060%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
100%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
100%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
98%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
97%
#176
Radeon Pro 460
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#180
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP: $139|Avg: $85
92%
#181
FirePro M5950
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
92%
#183
Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W4300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 550.

InsightFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 40.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+40.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4300 and Radeon RX 550

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score
2,719+2%
2,674
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS+18%
1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4300) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 171mm vs 155mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
171mm
155mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
71°C
Perf/Watt
54.4+2%
53.5
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W4300 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79 and now averages $35. The Radeon RX 550 costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (FirePro W4300) vs 76.4 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 40.4% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
MSRP
$379
$79-79%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$35-30%
Performance per Dollar
54.4
76.4+40%
Codename
Bonaire
Lexa
Release
December 1 2015
April 20 2017
Ranking
#590
#617