Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon RX 550

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W4300
4 GB 50
2,719
+1.7%
brand logoRadeon Vega 10
brand logoRadeon R9 M360
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 550
4 GB 50
2,674
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 M365X
brand logoRadeon R7 M465X
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 5
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    379.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $379 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • ❌10.3% longer card at 171mm vs 155mm.

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 371.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • ✅FirePro W4300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Measures 155mm instead of 171mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W4300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 2,674), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while FirePro W4300 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $379, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 371.8% (33.8 vs 7.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FirePro W4300 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score
2,719+2%
2,674
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS+18%
1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro W4300 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4300) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 171mm vs 155mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
171mm
155mm
Height
69mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
71°C
—
Perf/Watt
54.4+2%
53.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 was 79.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 369.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon RX 550
MSRP
$379
$79-79%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
33.8+369%
Codename
Bonaire
Lexa
Release
December 1 2015
April 20 2017
Ranking
#590
#617
Search FirePro W4300 on AmazonSearch Radeon RX 550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.