FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K4100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,120 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 287.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
295.5% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4100M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (2,773 vs 2,719), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W4300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W4300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,120 cheaper on MSRP at $379 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 287.8% (7.2 vs 1.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K4100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M).

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro K4100M
G3D Mark Score	2,719	2,773+2%
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1152+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.428 TFLOPS	1.627 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	48	96+100%
L1 Cache	192 KB+100%	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro K4100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4300) vs 512 KB (Quadro K4100M) — the Quadro K4100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro K4100M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro K4100M
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	171mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	71°C	—
Perf/Watt	54.4+96%	27.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Quadro K4100M launched at $1499. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 74.7% cheaper ($1120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) — the FirePro W4300 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4300 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro K4100M
MSRP	$379-75%	$1499
Performance per Dollar	7.2+300%	1.8
Codename	Bonaire	GK104
Release	December 1 2015	July 23 2013
Ranking	#590	#604

Search FirePro W4300 on Amazon

Search Quadro K4100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.