
FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R9 M380

FirePro W4300
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4300 is positioned at rank 168 and the Radeon R9 M380 is on rank 379, so the FirePro W4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W4300.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W4300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W4300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $300), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 492.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+492.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4300 and Radeon R9 M380

FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 2,752+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 171mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 171mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C-16% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4+48% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W4300 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The FirePro W4300 costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (FirePro W4300) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the FirePro W4300 offers 491.3% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | $300-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-83% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+491% | 9.2 |
| Codename | Bonaire | Strato |
| Release | December 1 2015 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #590 | #607 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















