FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R9 M380

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 26.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $379 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $79 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • Delivers 27.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M380 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (2,752 vs 2,719), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W4300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $79 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $379, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.9% (9.2 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W4300 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score
2,719
2,752+1%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R9 M380
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R9 M380
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 171mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R9 M380
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
171mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
71°C-16%
85
Perf/Watt
54.4+48%
36.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M380 was 20.8% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 27.8% better value.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R9 M380
MSRP
$379
$300-21%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
9.2+28%
Codename
Bonaire
Strato
Release
December 1 2015
May 5 2015
Ranking
#590
#607

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.