FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FirePro W4300
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W4300 is positioned at rank #168 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W4300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1061.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W4300.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1061.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1061.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W4300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4300 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 1061.4%. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 31,578+1061% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 7680+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+2707% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 7.5 MB+3847% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 48 MB+19100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro W4300 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 48 MB+19100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 140.3% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 171mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 171mm | 285mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C | 70°C-1% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4 | 110.8+104% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W4300 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The FirePro W4300 costs 91.5% less ($540 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (FirePro W4300) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the FirePro W4300 offers 1.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-53% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-92% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+2% | 53.5 |
| Codename | Bonaire | AD104 |
| Release | December 1 2015 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #590 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
