Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 560

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560

2011Core: 810 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 560 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W4300
4 GB 50
2,719
0.0%
brand logoRadeon Vega 10
brand logoRadeon R9 M360
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT
GeForce GTX 560
1 GB 150
2,768
+1.8%
brand logoGeForce 940MX
brand logoGeForce 945A
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1660
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    90.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $379 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 93.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (2,768 vs 2,719), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W4300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $180 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $379, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 93.9% (13.9 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W4300 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).

FeatureFirePro W4300GeForce GTX 560
G3D Mark Score
2,719
2,768+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768+129%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS+31%
1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
48
56+17%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W4300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W4300GeForce GTX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 carries 1 GB. FirePro W4300 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4300) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4300GeForce GTX 560
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560).

FeatureFirePro W4300GeForce GTX 560
Encoder
VCE 2.0
—
Decoder
UVD 4.2
—
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 100% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureFirePro W4300GeForce GTX 560
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
171mm
—
Height
69mm
—
Slots
1
—
Temp (Load)
71°C
—
Perf/Watt
54.4+194%
18.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 was 47.5% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 13.9 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 93.1% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4300 (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro W4300GeForce GTX 560
MSRP
$379
$199-47%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
13.9+93%
Codename
Bonaire
GF114
Release
December 1 2015
May 17 2011
Ranking
#590
#605
Search FirePro W4300 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.