FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 770M

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz

GeForce GTX 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro W4300

2,719

0.0%

2,784

+2.4%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4300 is positioned at rank 168 and the GeForce GTX 770M is on rank 54, so the GeForce GTX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

99%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

98%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

97%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

94%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

93%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

90%

#153

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2060%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

100%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

100%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

98%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

92%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

92%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

92%

#44

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

195%

#46

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

177%

#47

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

176%

#51

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

160%

#52

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

159%

#54

GeForce GTX 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#58

GeForce 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

97%

#62

Radeon 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

96%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

94%

#66

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

94%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 28% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+28%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W4300 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 770M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4300 and GeForce GTX 770M

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

GeForce GTX 770M

The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the GeForce GTX 770M reaches 2,784 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 770M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 770M). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M).

Feature	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
G3D Mark Score	2,719	2,784+2%
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	960+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.428 TFLOPS	1.53 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+140%	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 770M has 3 GB. The FirePro W4300 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4300) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) — the GeForce GTX 770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2.170	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 770M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 770M).

Feature	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
Encoder	VCE 2.0	1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder	UVD 4.2	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 770M's 75W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 75°C.

Feature	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 770M
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	171mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	71°C-5%	75°C
Perf/Watt	54.4+47%	37.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 770M costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (FirePro W4300) vs 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 27.9% better value. The FirePro W4300 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).