FirePro W4300 vs Quadro 6000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro 6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,020 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1072.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 204W, a 154W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1060.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
❌308% higher power demand at 204W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W4300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 2,692), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W4300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W4300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,020 cheaper on MSRP at $379 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1072.3% (7.2 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro 6000
G3D Mark Score	2,719+1%	2,692
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+71%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.428 TFLOPS+39%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	48	56+17%
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro 6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 64-bit on the Quadro 6000. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4300) vs 768 KB (Quadro 6000) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro 6000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 121.3% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro 6000
TDP	50W-75%	204W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	171mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	71°C	—
Perf/Watt	54.4+312%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Quadro 6000 launched at $4399. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 91.4% cheaper ($4020 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 0.6 (Quadro 6000) — the FirePro W4300 offers 1100% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4300 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro W4300	Quadro 6000
MSRP	$379-91%	$4399
Performance per Dollar	7.2+1100%	0.6
Codename	Bonaire	GF100
Release	December 1 2015	December 10 2010
Ranking	#590	#615

Search FirePro W4300 on Amazon

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.