FirePro W4300
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
FirePro W4300 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4300 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W4300 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,186 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2136.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 600W, a 550W reduction.
- ✅Measures 171mm instead of 304mm, a 133mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2159.9% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 600W vs 50W.
- ❌77.8% longer card at 304mm vs 171mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 2,747+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 24064+3033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 126 TFLOPS+8724% |
| ROPs | 16 | 192+1100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 752+1467% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 23.5 MB+12268% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W4300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q carries 2 GB. FirePro W4300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 512-bit on the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 512-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 169.2% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-92% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 171mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4+1083% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 95.6% cheaper ($8186 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the FirePro W4300 offers 2300% better value. The newer card here is RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-96% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2+2300% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Bonaire | GB202 |
| Release | December 1 2015 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #590 | #609 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
