FirePro W4300 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
FirePro W4300
Popular choices:
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4300 is positioned at rank 168 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is on rank 393, so the FirePro W4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300
Performance Per Dollar RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W4300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W4300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $8,565 for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q, it costs 99% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 16855.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16855.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4300 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 2,747+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 24064+3033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 126 TFLOPS+8724% |
| ROPs | 16 | 192+1100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 752+1467% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 23.5 MB+12268% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has 2 GB. The FirePro W4300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 512-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 169.2% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-92% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 171mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4+1083% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W4300 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565 and now averages $8565. The FirePro W4300 costs 99.4% less ($8515 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (FirePro W4300) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the FirePro W4300 offers 18033.3% better value. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-96% | $8565 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-99% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+18033% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Bonaire | GB202 |
| Release | December 1 2015 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #590 | #609 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
