FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
FirePro W4300
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4300 is positioned at rank 168 and the GeForce GTX 770M SLI is on rank 257, so the FirePro W4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | GeForce GTX 770M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W4300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W4300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $80), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 55.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W4300 | GeForce GTX 770M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4300 and GeForce GTX 770M SLI
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 811 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the GeForce GTX 770M SLI reaches 2,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 770M SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 1,920 (GeForce GTX 770M SLI).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce GTX 770M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 2,803+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1920+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce GTX 770M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 770M SLI has 2 GB. The FirePro W4300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce GTX 770M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 770M SLI's 150W — a 100% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 770M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce GTX 770M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 171mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4+191% | 18.7 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W4300 costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (FirePro W4300) vs 35.0 (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) — the FirePro W4300 offers 55.4% better value. The FirePro W4300 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce GTX 770M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-38% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+55% | 35.0 |
| Codename | Bonaire | — |
| Release | December 1 2015 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #590 | #430 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and GeForce GTX 770M SLI
