Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 465
1 GB 200
2,654
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 285
brand logoGeForce GTX 580M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 485M
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Shared System RAM 28
2,715
+2.3%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 465

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 465 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌614.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 28W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 28W instead of 200W, a 172W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (2,715 vs 2,654), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 465 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
G3D Mark Score
2,654
2,715+2%
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
352+340%
80
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 465 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 465 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 465 and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Decoder: VP4 vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Encoder
None
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
Decoder
VP4
Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 150.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
TDP
200W
28W-86%
Recommended PSU
550W
0W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
85
Perf/Watt
13.3
97.0+629%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 465 came in at $279, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($279 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
MSRP
$279
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
9.5
Infinity
Codename
GF100
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
May 31 2010
August 15 2020
Ranking
#618
#584
Search GeForce GTX 465 on AmazonSearch Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.