GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID K2

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz
VS

GRID K2

2013Core: 745 MHz

GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID K2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID K2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 465

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $4,920 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 1706.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K2

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • βœ…More future proof: Kepler (2012βˆ’2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1763.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,199 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID K2 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (2,737 vs 2,654), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 465 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,920 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $5,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1706.9% (9.5 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID K2 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID K2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

NVIDIA

GRID K2

The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 Γ—2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the GRID K2 reaches 2,737 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the GRID K2 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1,536 (GRID K2). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 2.289 TFLOPS Γ—2 (GRID K2).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID K2
G3D Mark Score
2,654
2,737+3%
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
352
1536 Γ—2+336%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS Γ—2+168%
ROPs
32
32 Γ—2
TMUs
44
128 Γ—2+191%
L1 Cache
704 KB+450%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 465 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID K2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K2 carries 2 GB. GRID K2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 465 and 64-bit on the GRID K2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID K2
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the GRID K2's 225W β€” a 11.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (GRID K2). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID K2
TDP
200W-11%
225W
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
2
β€”
Temp (Load)
85
β€”
Perf/Watt
13.3+9%
12.2
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 465 came in at $279, while the GRID K2 launched at $5199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 465 was 94.6% cheaper ($4920 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 0.5 (GRID K2) β€” the GeForce GTX 465 offers 1800% better value. The newer card here is GRID K2 (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID K2
MSRP
$279-95%
$5199
Performance per Dollar
9.5+1800%
0.5
Codename
GF100
GK104
Release
May 31 2010
May 11 2013
Ranking
#618
#611

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.