
GeForce GTX 465
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon RX 550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 465.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $40), it costs 13% less, resulting in a 15.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon RX 550

GeForce GTX 465
The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,654 | 2,674 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 512+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+450% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 465 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 550 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 102.6 GB/s (GeForce GTX 465) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 550) — a 9.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 550. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 102.6 GB/s | 112 GB/s+9% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 155mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 300W-45% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | 155mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 53.5+302% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79 and now averages $35. The Radeon RX 550 costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 76.4 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 15.2% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | $79-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $35-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3 | 76.4+15% |
| Codename | GF100 | Lexa |
| Release | May 31 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #618 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















