
GeForce GTX 465

Quadro K4000
GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 465
2010Why buy it
- ✅33.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $990 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 344% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌354.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,269 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 465
The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,654 | 2,719+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 768+118% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS+45% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 44 | 64+45% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+1000% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 465 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 465 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 384 KB (Quadro K4000) — the GeForce GTX 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 3 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 80W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 34.0+156% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 465 came in at $279, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 465 was 78% cheaper ($990 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 352.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4000 (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-78% | $1269 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.5+352% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GF100 | GK106 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #618 | #613 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















