G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 465 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 465 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 465

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $8,286 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2866% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 600W, a 400W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025

Why buy it

✅76.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
2969.9% HIGHER MSRP
$8,565 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 600W vs 200W.
❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 76.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (2,747 vs 2,654), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 188 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 465 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $8,286 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $8,565, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2866% (9.5 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 465 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 465 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
G3D Mark Score	2,654	2,747+4%
Architecture	Fermi	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	352	24064+6736%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	126 TFLOPS+14630%
ROPs	32	192+500%
TMUs	44	752+1609%
L1 Cache	0.69 MB	23.5 MB+3306%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	128 MB+25500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q carries 2 GB. RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 102.6 GB/s (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1792 GB/s (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — a 1646.6% advantage for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 465 and 512-bit on the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR7
Memory Bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	1792 GB/s+1647%
Bus Width	256-bit	512-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	128 MB+25500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: VP4 vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Encoder	None	NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder	VP4	NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
TDP	200W-67%	600W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	13.3+189%	4.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 465 came in at $279, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 465 was 96.7% cheaper ($8286 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 3066.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q (2025 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP	$279-97%	$8565
Performance per Dollar	9.5+3067%	0.3
Codename	GF100	GB202
Release	May 31 2010	March 18 2025
Ranking	#618	#609

Search GeForce GTX 465 on Amazon

Search RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.