CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 465
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 450 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro 450 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 465.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon Pro 450
GeForce GTX 465
The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,654 | 2,723+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 640+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+10% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+340% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 465 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro 450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 77.8+485% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers 2.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3 | 68.1+3% |
| Codename | GF100 | Baffin |
| Release | May 31 2010 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #618 | #612 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon Pro 450
