Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID M10-2Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID M10-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID M10-2Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 465
1 GB 200
2,654
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 285
brand logoGeForce GTX 580M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 485M
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
GRID M10-2Q
2 GB 225
2,692
+1.4%
brand logoGeForce 845M
brand logoGeForce GTX 580M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 670MX SLI
brand logoGeForce MX250
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID M10-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 465

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,221 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 783.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    796.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M10-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,654), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 465 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,221 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 783.4% (9.5 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M10-2Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID M10-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the GRID M10-2Q reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the GRID M10-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID M10-2Q
G3D Mark Score
2,654
2,692+1%
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
352
2048+482%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+464%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
44
128+191%
L1 Cache
704 KB
768 KB+9%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 465 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID M10-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2Q carries 2 GB. GRID M10-2Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 465 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID M10-2Q
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID M10-2Q
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_1
Max Displays
2
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the GRID M10-2Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (GRID M10-2Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID M10-2Q
TDP
200W-11%
225W
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
1mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
—
Perf/Watt
13.3+11%
12.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 465 came in at $279, while the GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 465 was 88.8% cheaper ($2221 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 763.6% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-2Q (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GRID M10-2Q
MSRP
$279-89%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
9.5+764%
1.1
Codename
GF100
GM204
Release
May 31 2010
August 30 2015
Ranking
#618
#433
Search GeForce GTX 465 on AmazonSearch GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.