GeForce GTX 465
VS
Radeon HD 8770

GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon HD 8770

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8770

2013Core: 775 MHzBoost: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770

#261
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
625%
#263
566%
#264
565%
#268
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
514%
#269
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
510%
#271
Radeon HD 8770
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#273
Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
99%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
98%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
97%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
97%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
97%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
95%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8770 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 281.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+281.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon HD 8770

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

AMD

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score
2,654+2%
2,607
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
352
384+9%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS+35%
0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
44+83%
24
L1 Cache
704 KB+633%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8770 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 102.6 GB/s (GeForce GTX 465) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon HD 8770) — a 6.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 465. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the GeForce GTX 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
102.6 GB/s+7%
96 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
Encoder
None
VCE 2.0
Decoder
VP4
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
TDP
200W
50W-75%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
13.3
52.1+292%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 465 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 281% better value. The Radeon HD 8770 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465Radeon HD 8770
MSRP
$279
$150-46%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-73%
$150
Performance per Dollar
66.3+281%
17.4
Codename
GF100
Mars
Release
May 31 2010
April 1 2013
Ranking
#618
#844