GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 465

1 GB 200

2,654

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon Pro WX 4150

4 GB 50

2,642

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 465

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4150 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

✅3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
7.5% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$279 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 465 instead at 2,654 vs 2,642, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 465 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8% (9.5 vs 8.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 4150 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon Pro WX 4150
G3D Mark Score	2,654	2,642
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	352	896+155%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	1.887 TFLOPS+121%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	44	56+27%
L1 Cache	704 KB+214%	224 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 465 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4150 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 465 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon Pro WX 4150
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon Pro WX 4150
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Encoder	None	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	VP4	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon Pro WX 4150
TDP	200W	50W-75%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	13.3	52.8+297%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 465 came in at $279, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 465 was 7% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4150 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP	$279-7%	$300
Performance per Dollar	9.5+8%	8.8
Codename	GF100	Baffin
Release	May 31 2010	March 1 2017
Ranking	#618	#620

Search GeForce GTX 465 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4150 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.