GeForce GTX 465
VS
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

GeForce GTX 465 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 465
200
2,654
+0.6%
brand logoGeForce GTX 285
brand logoGeForce GTX 580M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 485M
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
100
2,637
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 285
brand logoGeForce GTX 650
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 460
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
124%
#8
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
112%
#9
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
112%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
102%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
101%
#16
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance
✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 465 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 465 Benchmark Check

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low119 FPS
medium96 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS
medium72 FPS
high58 FPS
ultra42 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium24 FPS
high19 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low50 FPS
medium29 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra20 FPS
1440p
low32 FPS
medium19 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra13 FPS
4K
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low119 FPS
medium92 FPS
high71 FPS
ultra50 FPS
1440p
low77 FPS
medium58 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra25 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium22 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low119 FPS
medium95 FPS
high79 FPS
ultra59 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS
medium71 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra31 FPS
4K
low36 FPS
medium26 FPS
high20 FPS
ultra13 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low119 FPS
medium96 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS
medium72 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra45 FPS
4K
low60 FPS
medium48 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra30 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low119 FPS
medium95 FPS
high79 FPS
ultra59 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS
medium71 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra44 FPS
4K
low59 FPS
medium47 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra30 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low119 FPS
medium96 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra54 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS
medium72 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra32 FPS
4K
low42 FPS
medium35 FPS
high22 FPS
ultra14 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low119 FPS
medium95 FPS
high79 FPS
ultra59 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS
medium71 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low45 FPS
medium34 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra14 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 465 and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score
2,654
2,637
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
352
384+9%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
0.9523 TFLOPS+11%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
44
64+45%
L1 Cache
704 KB+38%
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX
12 (11_0)+9%
11.0
OpenGL
4.5+7%
4.2
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: VP4 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder
None
PureVideo HD
Decoder
VP4
VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP
200W
100W-50%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
—
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
13.3
26.4+98%
💰

Value Analysis

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP
$279
—
Avg Price (30d)
$40
—
Codename
GF100
GF114
Release
May 31 2010
March 22 2012
Ranking
#618
#704