Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Popular choices:
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2617 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,715 | 2,747+1% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 80 | 24064+29980% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 2617 MHz+94% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has 2 GB. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 512-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 1792 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 512-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 182.2% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-95% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0+2009% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565 and now averages $8565. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($8565 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $8565 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.3 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GB202 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #584 | #609 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
