GRID M10-8Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

GRID M10-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M10-8Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-8Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (2,637 vs 2,595), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M10-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M10-8Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

FeatureGRID M10-8QMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score
2,595
2,637+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS+76%
0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB
512 KB+60%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGRID M10-8QMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-8QMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureGRID M10-8QMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX
12 (12_1)+9%
11.0
OpenGL
4.6+10%
4.2
Max Displays
0
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

FeatureGRID M10-8QMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder
NVENC (4th Gen)
PureVideo HD
Decoder
NVDEC (2nd Gen)
VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureGRID M10-8QMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP
225W
100W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
11.5
26.4+130%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M10-8Q (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGRID M10-8QMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP
$2500
Codename
GM107
GF114
Release
May 18 2016
March 22 2012
Ranking
#622
#704

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.