
GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID M10-8Q

GeForce GTX 950A
Popular choices:

GRID M10-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 950A is positioned at rank 286 and the GRID M10-8Q is on rank 346, so the GeForce GTX 950A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-8Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950A | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $500), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1569.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950A | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1569.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950A and GRID M10-8Q

GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the GRID M10-8Q reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,599 | 2,595 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1306 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.7+202% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 94% less ($470 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.6 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 5.2 (GRID M10-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 1565.4% better value. The GRID M10-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-94% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-94% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6+1565% | 5.2 |
| Codename | GM107 | GM107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #621 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















