GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

2015Core: 993 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $141 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 85.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4150 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

  • 24.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 88.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,642 vs 2,599), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 950A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $141 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 85.6% (16.3 vs 8.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 4150 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1053 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950ARadeon Pro WX 4150
G3D Mark Score
2,599
2,642+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
896+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.439 TFLOPS
1.887 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+7%
1053 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
320 KB+43%
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950ARadeon Pro WX 4150
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950A has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950ARadeon Pro WX 4150
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
DDR3
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950ARadeon Pro WX 4150
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
34.7
52.8+52%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 950A came in at $159, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950A was 47% cheaper ($141 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 85.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4150 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950ARadeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP
$159-47%
$300
Performance per Dollar
16.3+85%
8.8
Codename
GM107
Baffin
Release
March 13 2015
March 1 2017
Ranking
#621
#620

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.