GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 950A is positioned at rank 286 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 is on rank 155, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

94%

#276

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

664%

#278

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

602%

#279

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

600%

#283

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

546%

#284

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

542%

#286

GeForce GTX 950A

MSRP: $159|Avg: $30

100%

#288

Radeon 540X

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

98%

#289

GeForce 930MX

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

98%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

96%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

96%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

94%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

92%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

98%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

86%

#140

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1677%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

100%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

98%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

96%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

93%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

85%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

81%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

81%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

81%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 950A	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 950A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $120), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 293.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 950A	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+293.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 950A Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4150 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro WX 4150

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1053 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Radeon Pro WX 4150
G3D Mark Score	2,599	2,642+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	896+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	1.887 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+7%	1053 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	320 KB+43%	224 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950A comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Radeon Pro WX 4150
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	DDR3	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Radeon Pro WX 4150
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	34.7	52.8+52%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 75% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.6 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 293.6% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).