GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

2015Core: 993 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 950A is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.5% in PassMark G3D (2,715 vs 2,599), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 950A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950AIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
G3D Mark Score
2,599
2,715+4%
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
640+700%
80
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1350 MHz+20%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950AIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950A has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 950A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950AIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
DDR3
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
32 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 91.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950AIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
TDP
75W
28W-63%
Recommended PSU
350W
0W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
34.7
97.0+180%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 950A came in at $159, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($159 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950AIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
MSRP
$159
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
16.3
Infinity
Codename
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
March 13 2015
August 15 2020
Ranking
#621
#584

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.