FirePro R5000 vs GeForce GTX 950A
FirePro R5000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 950A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro R5000 is positioned at rank 272 and the GeForce GTX 950A is on rank 286, so the FirePro R5000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro R5000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro R5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950A.
| Insight | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 390.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+390.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro R5000 and GeForce GTX 950A
FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.
GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the GeForce GTX 950A reaches 2,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 950A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950A). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647+2% | 2,599 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS | 1.439 TFLOPS+14% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro R5000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950A has 2 GB. The FirePro R5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro R5000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 950A's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 34.7+97% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (FirePro R5000) vs 86.6 (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 392% better value. The GeForce GTX 950A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | $159-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $30-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6 | 86.6+392% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM107 |
| Release | February 25 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #619 | #621 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro R5000 and GeForce GTX 950A
