FirePro R5000 vs GeForce GTX 950A

FirePro R5000

2013Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

2015Core: 993 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro R5000 vs GeForce GTX 950A Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro R5000 vs GeForce GTX 950A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro R5000

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 591.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,099 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $940 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
  • Delivers 578.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro R5000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (2,647 vs 2,599), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro R5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $940 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $1,099, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 578.7% (16.3 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 950A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro R5000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro R5000 vs GeForce GTX 950A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro R5000

The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the GeForce GTX 950A reaches 2,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 950A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950A). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A).

FeatureFirePro R5000GeForce GTX 950A
G3D Mark Score
2,647+2%
2,599
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+20%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.267 TFLOPS
1.439 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48+20%
40
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro R5000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro R5000GeForce GTX 950A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro R5000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950A carries 2 GB. FirePro R5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro R5000 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro R5000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro R5000GeForce GTX 950A
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
DDR3
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 950A's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureFirePro R5000GeForce GTX 950A
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
279mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
17.6
34.7+97%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro R5000 came in at $1099, while the GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950A was 85.5% cheaper ($940 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (FirePro R5000) vs 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 579.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950A (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro R5000GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP
$1099
$159-86%
Performance per Dollar
2.4
16.3+579%
Codename
Pitcairn
GM107
Release
February 25 2013
March 13 2015
Ranking
#619
#621

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.