FirePro R5000 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro R5000 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro R5000 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro R5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro R5000 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647 | 2,637 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS+33% | 0.9523 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro R5000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro R5000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M carries 2 GB. FirePro R5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro R5000 and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: UVD vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | UVD | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 40% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 26.4+50% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro R5000 (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | — |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GF114 |
| Release | February 25 2013 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #619 | #704 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















