
FirePro R5000

Radeon RX 550
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon RX 550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro R5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1291.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,099 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,020 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1305.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅FirePro R5000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647 | 2,674+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS+5% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro R5000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro R5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 155mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 279mm | 155mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 53.5+204% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro R5000 came in at $1099, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 was 92.8% cheaper ($1020 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (FirePro R5000) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 1308.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | $79-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 33.8+1308% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Lexa |
| Release | February 25 2013 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #619 | #617 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















