FirePro R5000 vs Quadro K4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro R5000 vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro R5000 vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro R5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($1,099 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌15.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,269 MSRPvs$1,099 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro R5000 vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647 | 2,719+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS+2% | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+200% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro R5000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. FirePro R5000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro R5000 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro R5000) vs 384 KB (Quadro K4000) — the FirePro R5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 80W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 34.0+93% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro R5000 came in at $1099, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. On MSRP, FirePro R5000 was 13.4% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (FirePro R5000) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the FirePro R5000 offers 14.3% better value.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099-13% | $1269 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4+14% | 2.1 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK106 |
| Release | February 25 2013 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #619 | #613 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro R5000 and Quadro K4000
