
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

FirePro R5000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro R5000 is positioned at rank 272 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 is on rank 155, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro R5000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro R5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 4150.
| Insight | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $150), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro R5000 and Radeon Pro WX 4150

FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647 | 2,642 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS+49% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 224 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro R5000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 52.8+200% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 and now averages $120. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (FirePro R5000) vs 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 25% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | $300-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $120-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6 | 22.0+25% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Baffin |
| Release | February 25 2013 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #619 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















