Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro R5000 vs FirePro W4300

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro R5000

2013Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro R5000 vs FirePro W4300 Performance Spectrum

FirePro R5000
4 GB 150
2,647
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 M365X
brand logoRadeon HD 5830
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon R9 M470
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT
FirePro W4300
4 GB 50
2,719
+2.7%
brand logoRadeon Vega 10
brand logoRadeon R9 M360
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro R5000 vs FirePro W4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro R5000

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    190% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,099 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
  • ❌63.2% longer card at 279mm vs 171mm.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 197.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 171mm instead of 279mm, a 108mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W4300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 2,647), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro R5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $720 cheaper on MSRP at $379 vs $1,099, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 197.9% (7.2 vs 2.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W4300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro R5000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro R5000 vs FirePro W4300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro R5000

The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the FirePro W4300 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).

FeatureFirePro R5000FirePro W4300
G3D Mark Score
2,647
2,719+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.267 TFLOPS
1.428 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro R5000FirePro W4300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro R5000 and 64-bit on the FirePro W4300. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro R5000) vs 256 KB (FirePro W4300) — the FirePro R5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro R5000FirePro W4300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 12 (FirePro W4300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2.170. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.

FeatureFirePro R5000FirePro W4300
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2.170
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
6
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300).

FeatureFirePro R5000FirePro W4300
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 100% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 171mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 71°C.

FeatureFirePro R5000FirePro W4300
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
279mm
171mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
71°C-16%
Perf/Watt
17.6
54.4+209%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro R5000 came in at $1099, while the FirePro W4300 launched at $379. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 65.5% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (FirePro R5000) vs 7.2 (FirePro W4300) — the FirePro W4300 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4300 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro R5000FirePro W4300
MSRP
$1099
$379-66%
Performance per Dollar
2.4
7.2+200%
Codename
Pitcairn
Bonaire
Release
February 25 2013
December 1 2015
Ranking
#619
#590
Search FirePro R5000 on AmazonSearch FirePro W4300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.