
FirePro R5000

Radeon HD 8770
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro R5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌632.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,099 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
- ❌16.3% longer card at 279mm vs 240mm.
Radeon HD 8770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $949 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 621.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 279mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro R5000 vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647+2% | 2,607 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS+100% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+100% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro R5000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8770 carries 2 GB. FirePro R5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro R5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro R5000) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the FirePro R5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 52.1+196% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro R5000 came in at $1099, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 86.4% cheaper ($949 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (FirePro R5000) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 625% better value.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | $150-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 17.4+625% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Mars |
| Release | February 25 2013 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #619 | #844 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















