
GeForce GTX 950A

Radeon HD 6950
GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon HD 6950 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon HD 6950 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon HD 6950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 950A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 8.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6950 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 6950
2010Why buy it
- ✅42.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌88.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.7 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon HD 6950 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

Radeon HD 6950
The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the Radeon HD 6950 reaches 2,593 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6950 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,599 | 2,593 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1408+120% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+41% | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 88+120% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 352 KB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6950 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950A has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6950 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 950A gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6950. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6950) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 32 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6950's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6950). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 275mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.7+167% | 13.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 950A came in at $159, while the Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950A was 46.8% cheaper ($140 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 8.7 (Radeon HD 6950) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 87.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950A (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-47% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+87% | 8.7 |
| Codename | GM107 | Cayman |
| Release | March 13 2015 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #621 | #623 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















