GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro 6000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro 6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2571.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 204W, a 129W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅70.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2666.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌172% higher power demand at 204W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 70.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,599), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 950A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 950A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,240 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2571.1% (16.3 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro 6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Quadro 6000
G3D Mark Score	2,599	2,692+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+43%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS+40%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	320 KB	896 KB+180%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Quadro 6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950A has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A and 64-bit on the Quadro 6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 0.75 MB (Quadro 6000) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Quadro 6000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	DDR3	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 92.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Quadro 6000
TDP	75W-63%	204W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	34.7+163%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 950A came in at $159, while the Quadro 6000 launched at $4399. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950A was 96.4% cheaper ($4240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 0.6 (Quadro 6000) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 2616.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950A (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	Quadro 6000
MSRP	$159-96%	$4399
Performance per Dollar	16.3+2617%	0.6
Codename	GM107	GF100
Release	March 13 2015	December 10 2010
Ranking	#621	#615

Search GeForce GTX 950A on Amazon

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.