GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 950A

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

2015Core: 993 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 950A Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 950A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 950A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 465

2010

Why buy it

  • 19.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 75.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $279 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $120 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
  • Delivers 71.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (2,654 vs 2,599), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $279, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 71.8% (16.3 vs 9.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 950A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 465 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 950A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the GeForce GTX 950A reaches 2,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 950A uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950A). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 950A
G3D Mark Score
2,654+2%
2,599
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
352
640+82%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
1.439 TFLOPS+68%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
44+10%
40
L1 Cache
704 KB+120%
320 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 950A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950A carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 950A gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 102.6 GB/s (GeForce GTX 465) vs 32 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950A) — a 220.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 465. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 465 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 950A
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
DDR3
Memory Bandwidth
102.6 GB/s+221%
32 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 950A's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950A). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 950A
TDP
200W
75W-63%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
13.3
34.7+161%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 465 came in at $279, while the GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950A was 43% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 71.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950A (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP
$279
$159-43%
Performance per Dollar
9.5
16.3+72%
Codename
GF100
GM107
Release
May 31 2010
March 13 2015
Ranking
#618
#621

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.