GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID M10-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID M10-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID M10-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,341 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1418% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1472.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,599), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 950A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 950A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,341 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1418% (16.3 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M10-2Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID M10-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the GRID M10-2Q reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the GRID M10-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID M10-2Q
G3D Mark Score	2,599	2,692+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	2048+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+235%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1178 MHz+5%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB	768 KB+140%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID M10-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A and 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID M10-2Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	DDR3	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the GRID M10-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (GRID M10-2Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID M10-2Q
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	34.7+189%	12.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 950A came in at $159, while the GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950A was 93.6% cheaper ($2341 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 1381.8% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID M10-2Q
MSRP	$159-94%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	16.3+1382%	1.1
Codename	GM107	GM204
Release	March 13 2015	August 30 2015
Ranking	#621	#433

Search GeForce GTX 950A on Amazon

Search GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.