GRID M10-8Q
VS
Radeon RX 550

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon RX 550

GRID M10-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-8Q is positioned at rank #346 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-8Q

#331
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
14205%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
100%
#347
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
99%
#348
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
99%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
94%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
93%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
91%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
90%
#355
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
88%
#356
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
88%
#358
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
87%
#359
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
86%
#360
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
85%
#361
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-8Q.

InsightGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $500), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1372.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1372.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-8Q and Radeon RX 550

NVIDIA

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score
2,595
2,674+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640+25%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS+38%
1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+10%
1183 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_0
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
Encoder
NVENC (4th Gen)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC (2nd Gen)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 155mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
267mm
155mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
11.5
53.5+365%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79 and now averages $35. The Radeon RX 550 costs 93% less ($465 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 76.4 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 1369.2% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon RX 550
MSRP
$2500
$79-97%
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$35-93%
Performance per Dollar
5.2
76.4+1369%
Codename
GM107
Lexa
Release
May 18 2016
April 20 2017
Ranking
#622
#617