
FirePro R5000 vs GRID M10-8Q

FirePro R5000
Popular choices:

GRID M10-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro R5000 is positioned at rank 272 and the GRID M10-8Q is on rank 346, so the FirePro R5000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro R5000
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro R5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-8Q.
| Insight | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro R5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro R5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $500), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 240% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+240%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro R5000 and GRID M10-8Q

FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the GRID M10-8Q reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647+2% | 2,595 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+32% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro R5000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-8Q has 2 GB. The FirePro R5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro R5000) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC (2nd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (4th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC (2nd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro R5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6+53% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The FirePro R5000 costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (FirePro R5000) vs 5.2 (GRID M10-8Q) — the FirePro R5000 offers 238.5% better value. The GRID M10-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099-56% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-70% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+238% | 5.2 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM107 |
| Release | February 25 2013 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #619 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















