GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID M10-8Q

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz

GRID M10-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 465

200

2,654

+2.3%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GRID M10-8Q

225

2,595

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-8Q

#331

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

14205%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

100%

#347

Quadro FX 3800

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

99%

#348

FirePro V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170

99%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

94%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

93%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

91%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

90%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

88%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

88%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

87%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

86%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

85%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GRID M10-8Q is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GRID M10-8Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-8Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1178.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1178.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 465 Benchmark Check

GRID M10-8Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 465 and GRID M10-8Q

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the GRID M10-8Q reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
G3D Mark Score	2,654+2%	2,595
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	352	640+82%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	1.672 TFLOPS+95%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	44+10%	40
L1 Cache	704 KB+120%	320 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-8Q has 2 GB. The GRID M10-8Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q). Decoder: VP4 vs NVDEC (2nd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
Encoder	None	NVENC (4th Gen)
Decoder	VP4	NVDEC (2nd Gen)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 465	GRID M10-8Q
TDP	200W-11%	225W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85	85
Perf/Watt	13.3+16%	11.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The GeForce GTX 465 costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 5.2 (GRID M10-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 1175% better value. The GRID M10-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).