GeForce GTX 465
VS
FirePro R5000

GeForce GTX 465 vs FirePro R5000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz
VS

FirePro R5000

2013Core: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro R5000

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
98%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
97%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
88%
#257
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6130%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
100%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
99%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
97%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
97%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
94%
#280
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
92%
#281
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
92%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
89%
#286
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
88%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro R5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 276% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+276%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 465 and FirePro R5000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

AMD

FirePro R5000

The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the FirePro R5000 reaches 2,647 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the FirePro R5000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 768 (FirePro R5000). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
G3D Mark Score
2,654
2,647
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
352
768+118%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
1.267 TFLOPS+48%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
44
48+9%
L1 Cache
704 KB+267%
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 465 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro R5000 has 4 GB. The FirePro R5000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465) vs 12 (FirePro R5000). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
OpenGL
4.5+7%
4.2
Max Displays
2
6+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 465) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
Encoder
None
VCE 1.0
Decoder
VP4
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the FirePro R5000's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro R5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (FirePro R5000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 279mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
TDP
200W
150W-25%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
279mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
13.3
17.6+32%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 465 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 17.6 (FirePro R5000) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 276.7% better value. The FirePro R5000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 465FirePro R5000
MSRP
$279-75%
$1099
Avg Price (30d)
$40-73%
$150
Performance per Dollar
66.3+277%
17.6
Codename
GF100
Pitcairn
Release
May 31 2010
February 25 2013
Ranking
#618
#619