Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

CPUCPUGPUGPU

GRID M10-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum

GRID M10-8Q
2 GB 225
2,595
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 660M
brand logoGeForce GTX 760M
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 v2
brand logoGeForce GTX 460
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Radeon Pro WX 4150
4 GB 50
2,642
+1.8%
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon HD 5830
brand logoRadeon R9 350
brand logoRadeon R9 M470
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    733.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 748.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (2,642 vs 2,595), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M10-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,200 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 748.4% (8.8 vs 1.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1053 MHz.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon Pro WX 4150
G3D Mark Score
2,595
2,642+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
896+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS
1.887 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+24%
1053 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
320 KB+43%
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon Pro WX 4150
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon Pro WX 4150
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon Pro WX 4150
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon Pro WX 4150
Encoder
NVENC (4th Gen)
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder
NVDEC (2nd Gen)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon Pro WX 4150
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
11.5
52.8+359%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-8Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 4150 was 88% cheaper ($2200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 780% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4150 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP
$2500
$300-88%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
8.8+780%
Codename
GM107
Baffin
Release
May 18 2016
March 1 2017
Ranking
#622
#620
Search GRID M10-8Q on AmazonSearch Radeon Pro WX 4150 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.